Quality standards and guardrails

Problem

As more engineers contribute to the MCP server, agent prompts, and eval cases, there are no enforced quality standards. Eval cases vary in structure and coverage depth, prompt templates are inconsistent in tone and formatting, and tool response schemas have no validation beyond ad-hoc testing. Without codified standards — what constitutes a passing eval, how tool responses must be structured, what prompt patterns are approved — quality will degrade as the contributor base grows. The guardrail framework needs explicit rules so that new contributors cannot accidentally ship regressions or inconsistent behavior.

Context

Possible Solutions

Plan

Implementation Progress

Review Feedback

• Review cleared