Design-partner feedback loop operations¶
Problem¶
Design partners report MCP tool issues through ad-hoc channels (Slack, email, verbal), and there is no standardized path from a reported problem to a shipped fix. Feedback sits in threads without being triaged, root-caused, or linked to code changes. When fixes are shipped, there is no decision log explaining what was changed and why, making it hard for other contributors to understand the rationale or avoid re-introducing the same issue. This slow, lossy feedback loop means design partners wait weeks for fixes that should take days, and the team cannot demonstrate responsiveness — a prerequisite for partner retention.
Context¶
Possible Solutions¶
Plan¶
Implementation Progress¶
Review Feedback¶
- Review cleared