v1.0 stability and defect burn-down

Problem

After public launch, defect reports will arrive from a much wider range of environments and usage patterns than internal testing covered. Without a structured stability program — recurring defect triage, severity-based SLAs, reliability metrics, and trend tracking — the team will operate reactively, fixing whatever is loudest rather than what matters most. Known defects will accumulate without a burn-down cadence, reliability will degrade silently between releases, and there will be no data to answer "is the extension getting more or less stable over time?" A v1.0 label requires demonstrable reliability, not just feature completeness.

Context

Possible Solutions

Plan

Implementation Progress

Review Feedback

• Review cleared