Quality standards and guardrails

Problem

As more contributors add chart types, interaction behaviors, and styling options to the graph library, there is no enforced standard for what constitutes acceptable output quality. One contributor's tooltip implementation may differ from another's; hover states may be inconsistent across chart types; accessibility (contrast ratios, screen reader labels, keyboard navigation) may be present on some charts and absent on others. Without defined quality standards and automated guardrails (visual regression tests, accessibility linting, interaction consistency checks), the library's output will drift toward inconsistency — making it feel like a collection of one-offs rather than a coherent visual system.

Context

Possible Solutions

Plan

Implementation Progress

Review Feedback

• Review cleared